Explore
Gaia Soulmates
 Advertising keeps Gaia free! Interested in sponsoring us?

"Community is Born of Necessity"

Posted on Feb 1st, 2008 by asecondlifediary : A Second Life Diary asecondlifediary

Joe Bageant, at home in the Garifuna village of Hopkins, Belize, where I visited him last week

The above quote is from Joe Bageant's son. It came up in our recent discussion on Intentional Community versus 'Accidental' Community. Community is born of necessity. This one sentence, Joe believed, explained the success of Accidental Communities, and the failure of so many well-considered Intentional Communities.

Since Mia and I are planning on creating an Intentional Community here in Second Life, this came to me as quite a revelation. I'm wondering now, when there is no necessity, no struggle, no urgency to create community in Second Life, is our plan even feasible?

I should have realized this, of course; it's an affirmation of Pollard's Law -- we do what we must, then we do what's easy, and then we do what's fun. My ancestors, thrown together with strangers in a frontier land two centuries ago under harsh conditions, American ex-pats sharing a common passion (loyalty to the King of England) had no choice but to make their Accidental Community of 13 families work, carving homes out of the frozen wilderness without electric light, electric power or hydrocarbons. Thousands of Canadians can now, like me, trace their ancestry to this community.

Likewise, the Garifuna of Belize, where I just visited, who bailed out of shipwrecked slave ships over three centuries ago, had no choice but to make their Accidental Community work, and its culture remains, improbably and against all odds, prevalent today in much of the country.

Meanwhile, the Intentional Communities of the world have a low success rate and an average population of just eleven people. They are the product, often, of affluent, comfortable people who have selected each other carefully and patiently, and who have a shared passion that most Accidental Communities lack. They are experiments of joy designed to discover what works and what doesn't, by learning from failure. They never really succeed, most of them, perhaps because they don't have to.

Cal
Access_public Access: Public What do you think? Print views (881)  

What Do We Want From Love?

Posted on Feb 7th, 2008 by asecondlifediary : A Second Life Diary asecondlifediary
Miacalkiss
THE OTHER MORNING, as I contemplated my deepening love for Cal, I began to wonder what it was that I wanted from love.

I had been reading a friend's blog and knowing they are in a relationship that means a lot to them, wondered why that love wasn't expressed more in his blog.   It felt to me that maybe 'love',  to him, was restricted to just the two of them, the ones in the relationship, without it having enough 'strength' or 'power' to emanate further out into his world.   Whereas, for his partner, that love just radiated out from her, embuing her life with a joyousness that was easily spread.

Years ago I read the very funny, "Eat, Pray, Love" by Elizabeth Gilbert where she says her lover acted as though she wanted to eat his soul, when all she wanted to do was .... er, eat his soul! 

I am guilty of this same urge - to utterly consume the object of my affections - to have them entirely inside myself.     To know their every thought, feeling, action.   Is this normal?    Do others feel like this?   Is insecurity a companion to love?

When Cal says, "I love you", how do I know that he loves me as much as I love him?    And why does it matter?    Why am I consumed with these moments of insecurity?   In my moments of rational thought, I know that I love him no matter what - I don't hold back what I feel until I am sure he feels the same.   I love him and want him to be happy - it's as simple as that.   Is it my hormones playing tricks and complicating things?

Fortunately Cal is comfortable (at least for the moment), with this constant temperature-taking of our relationship, but I wonder why it's always me who has the thermometer in hand?   Is it just me who is insecure, or women in general?   Very early in our relationship, he urged me to be "fearless" and I keep repeating this word as a mantra but all it takes is a bit of a silence from him, to instantly feel as though he is bored with me, or wondering how to tell me that his feelings for me have diminished.

I hate this insecurity!    What will it take for me to feel reassured?

Cal says that I am living in the future, waiting for our eventual meeting outside the cyber world of Second Life and that's true.    But I think it's more that I am looking forward to the next stage of our relationship - the REAL deepening of our connection.   The opportunity to see, touch, smell and intertwine with one another.

For me, I feel that our relationship has pretty much expanded to its limit here in the cyber world.   I mean, how many times can you say, "I love you, I love you"?   We have walked together, talked together, ridden horses together, socialised together, danced together - explored as many avenues of expression in Second Life that we are aware of.   As much as I love conversation and cyber connection on poseballs, I'm still wanting more.

But that is one of my failings.   "Give me an inch and I want a mile".    No matter what I have, I want more.

It probably doesn't help that Cal reminds me from time to time, that 'our' relationship isn't just the two of us - that eventually there will be others in our beautiful love ocean.   I don't think he trusts me that when it comes down to it, that I won't squib out and renege on accepting others in our circle of love.

But it is OUR relationship, just the two of us that I am focused on at the moment.   I want to make sure that we have a secure, loving base on which to expand lovingness.   Actually, I'm quite looking forward to seeing who it is we eventually absorb into our polyamorous community.    (I've been told I have a FEROCIOUS curiosity).      I just want to make sure that what Cal and I have together is good and true and lasting.

I don't know why I need to know if the extent of love we feel for one another is on a par.   To be honest, I think ebb and flow in a relationship is a good thing - each partner taking a turn at steering the ship, or 'carrying the load' as it were.   As a matter of fact, very early in our relationship, Cal made an observation that it was me steering our relationship, while he had his foot on the accelerator.   Now, I feel as though it is my foot on the accelerator, and he is the one doing the steering.

I do wonder though if men are always calculating the price they have to 'pay' for love, against what they are getting out of it; while women are more "It's worth any price to be loved".   What do you think?


Access_public Access: Public 5 Comments Print views (9,791)  

Twelve Things I Love About Mia

Posted on Feb 11th, 2008 by asecondlifediary : A Second Life Diary asecondlifediary
valentine from doggybloggy
In earlier post I promised to write about the things I love about Mia, my collaborator on this blog and in my efforts to create an Intentional Community in Second Life. As I thought about it, I realized these were the same things I look for in a partner or collaborator on any important venture -- projects, enterprises, communities. And the same qualities I treasure in a friend. And the same qualities I try to exemplify myself, in practicing to Let-Myself-Change to be a better model, in trying to make the world a better place*.

Mia exemplifies these twelve qualities:
  1. Intelligence: A combination of good critical thinking skills and excellent instincts (and a willingness to trust them). Smart people like Mia are fun, and sexy.
  2. Emotional Strength: Freedom from neediness -- it's OK to love attention and appreciation, but when someone can't live without constant external validation, they can become unbearable. If you want others to love you, you have to love yourself first. Mia has learned to do that. That seems to be rare in First Life and Second Life.
  3. Attention Skills: Emotional sensitivity, perceptiveness, awareness, openness, capacity to listen, to focus the senses on what is really happening, and collaboratively figure out what it all means. Mia is not one of those people who lives their whole life in their heads, or in an emotional cocoon. She's learned to get outside herself, and she's very generous with her attention.
  4. Honesty: About what you love, what you can't stand, what you believe in, and what you have doubts about. Mia just gets it all out there. She's always offering constructive ideas and alternatives. And she never, ever lies (that includes saying nothing when there is something that must be said). She calls it "taking the temperature" of our relationship. It's delightfully refreshing, and reassuring.
  5. Communication Skills: Ability to articulate concisely and precisely what you know and what you think and what you love, orally and in writing (and to show, not just tell). Mia's a writer by vocation, and she's very good at it.
  6. Learning Skills: The self-directed ability to discover, access and process useful information (captured, experiential, and in conversation). This is the key to self-management and independence and making yourself a useful and valuable partner. Mia is self-driven to learn. And she's more open-minded than I am.
  7. Passion and Responsibility: Belief that what's possible can happen, and energy and a sense of responsibility directed to a shared purpose. We know what we have to do, and we're going to do it. Come see what we've done already in Second Life. Talk to any of those who've come to know and love Mia.
  8. Curiosity, Imagination and Creativity: The desire and capacity to find out what you don't know, to think about what could be, and to bring those imaginings to fruition. Mia is so curious, she purrs.
  9. Different Perspectives & Complementary Strengths: We are often attracted to people who share our beliefs, our culture, and our skills, but in my experience the best partners are those whose gifts and points of view complement each other (i.e. neither conflict nor overlap). We don't argue, but we poke fun at each other when we have different ideas. We laugh a lot. Yin and yang.
  10. Self-Knowledge, and Knowledge of Others' Capacities: Knowing which capacities you have, and which you lack, and what you know, and what you don't, and what others can do better than you can, is enormously important to collaboration and love, especially in coping with challenges. We've both spent a lot of time in contemplation, getting to know ourselves, and now, each other.
  11. Love, Respect and Trust: Most of us love and trust those who love and trust us in return. The alternative is dysfunctional and dangerous, a recipe for either abuse or co-dependency. We look at many of the relationships of others we know in First Life and Second Life, and shake our heads. There are a lot of co-dependents out there. We're co-independents.
  12. BGP: Beauty, grace and presence: Deny it all you want, we all prefer to be with people who are attractive, gracious, charismatic, and energizing. Some are naturally more gifted at this than others, but we can all improve, with practice. Ask anyone who knows Mia, they'll tell you -- she's lovely and charming and completely adorable.
Happy Valentine's Day, Mia. LYAW.

* So I confess this list is doing double-duty on my other blog, in homage to my long-suffering readers. The image, BTW, is from doggybloggy.com
Access_public Access: Public What do you think? Print views (284)  

Some Of My Favourite Things - Romance & Relationships

Posted on Feb 13th, 2008 by asecondlifediary : A Second Life Diary asecondlifediary
Valhorses
IT'S VALENTINE'S DAY and so Cal and I have bought one another a horse in Second Life to celebrate.   His is a handsome chestnut/brown beast and mine is a lovely Palomino, named Jinj (as in ginger).  

We are both interested in wild and lonely landscapes to explore and one of our favourites is called Lyonesse, although Commonwealth looks appealing too, and Sancto Sanctorum is a long-standing favourite.

One of the things I like doing best is suspending disbelief in SL - and somehow, sitting atop a noble beast and clip-clopping through the landscape really suits my romantic idea of exploration.    (If anyone knows of 'wild' places in SL, please let us know!)

Cal and I are constantly talking whenever we are online together - bserving the landscape, speculating on the who, what, where, why of things.   Examining the minutiae of the things around us - colours, concepts, layout, design, rationale etc.   

I'm intrigued by the differences in how we see the world.   I call his way of being as 'academic' (which he hates), but he is more inclined toward seeing things in terms of graphs, facts and figures; while I am tend to see most everything from an emotional point of view.    (Not that he doesn't, but he expresses it in what I see as a more 'academic' way).

He is just so 'connected'.   I feel far more of a 'floater' through life - just trah-lah-lah'ing along.

Another favourite thing I enjoy is how we communicate with others in SL.    We are always in voice chat via headphones with one another, so even when we are talking in text with others, we are chatting back and forth with one another.    Making observations about the social situation we are.   It's a great way of communicating, and I know that when we eventually meet in First Life (which will be in April), I will miss this unique way of communicating - having one conversation with others, and a more private one just between the two of us.

Communication is a huge thing with us.   Today, for instance, Cal was enroute between cities on a business trip, and bad weather threatened to ground him at the airport.   I just happened to send him a Skype text message which he received on his blackberry or laptop - so we were able to chat back and forth in between him picking up announcements about wait lists etc.   Modern technology gives us so many ways to stay in touch and maintain a link.

We are now REALLY starting to focus on relationships with others - people we think might be compatible couples to absorb into our polyamorous / intentional community.   But at the same time Cal is still weighing up the relative merits of intentional vs accidental community.

He is looking at the various pluses and minuses of how a community is made up.   Probably the best way of explaining it is if say 100 people were FORCED into creating a community through a plane crashing on to a desert island.   Everyone involved has a vested interest in making sure there was no conflict and they found a way of all getting along together and creating a good social structure.

Whereas, as we are now - well fed, comfortably housed, financially stable, independent beings - we are far more likely to be distracted by egos, priorities, personal viewpoints, financial considerations etc.   We don't have a vested interest in the community working, because if we don't like it, we can always leave.   An accidental community doesn't have that luxury - they HAVE TO make it work!     There is nowhere else to go.

It's a metaphor for the planet I guess - you have to love it, cos you can't leave it!

One of the things I hope to bring you soon, are a couple of examples of other communities that people are working on at the moment.      There are just so many things happening on a global scale in so many different areas - we truly ARE at the banquet of life at this period of time.

Happy Valentine's Day - I hope you get a horse!   

Love,

Mia






Access_public Access: Public 2 Comments Print views (855)  

Why Are People So Wary Of Polyamoury?

Posted on Feb 16th, 2008 by asecondlifediary : A Second Life Diary asecondlifediary
Stargaze

WHILE THE JOURNEY to polyamoury is a new one for me, we have heard from one of our readers who is further along in their exploration.    They have a partner who is the treasurer for an association buying land for an intentional community.   

The partner was quite high up in multi-national company, but because she was burnt out from stress she changed occupations.   She kept in touch with her girlfriends at the previous company and likes to attend their girls' evenings to catch up on old gossip. 

But I will leave it to our reader to tell their story:

"She is not really interested in talking about our IC - ecounit. When asked, she likes to respond about the areas of concern - investment, urine separation, planning permission, legal framework, community rules, social cohesion.

So her girlfriends started asking her about the IC. However she responded, they always brought the subject back to …..SEX.   Conversation invariably went along these lines:

” We intend to introduce urine separation, recycling of all nutrients”
“Yes, but won't you end up all having sex with each other?”

The more Caroline recounted the evening, the more I laughed - but I realised these ladies were REALLY WORRIED.   Their concerns seemed to consist of:

*   Worry that the women would go after other women's men.   Presumably, this means that although they would not consider it, they think another woman would think differently).

*   Worry that these affairs would ruin the community and the investment (agreed there).

*   But if they are worried their man is going to leave them in THAT situation, why not in the situation they are in?   Is it just the situation that is keeping them together?

*   Or, are they worried (and I suspect this is close to the truth, but then I'm a man), that they would be confronted with the fact that polyamory is something they really want to do themselves and that they will REALLY enjoy it.  They are, I speculate, at present in a situation where they do not need to confront this and they do not need to practice the openness and honesty that is needed in a polyamourous relationship.

Maybe that is why they find Intentional Communities so threatening. Believe me, these women were worried. 

One night, when we all went out to a restaurant, my partner and I gave one of them a lift home and when I gave her a big hug goodbye, I thought the look of shock on her face was due to the wine she'd been drinking.   After Caroline told me their concerns, I realised that there must have been something else in it.

We recounted the story back to another woman who is also on the board of our IC, and her reaction was that a lot of sex would distract from why she was there in the first place - which was for the organic gardening and closeness to nature. 

Another reaction was  - so?    You have to be real.   If you want to have multiple partners and do, then you are being real.   If you do want multiple partners and don't, then you are not being real.   If you don't want multiple partners and do, then you are not being real.   That's where the internal conflict comes in - when you cross your own line.

I am a newbie in SL - just one poseball kiss - but from the encounters I have had in SL, I can see that the platform can really help you sort yourself out in terms of honesty, fear of love, what you want from love etc.   

Maybe any induction programme a new IC sets up should include a period of time spent on SL."

This reader's views pretty much reflect what both Cal and I feel and have experienced - that so many people we talk to about polyamoury, focus on the sex rather than the importance of relationships.

When we first decided to establish a polyamorous/intentional community in SL, we were very open and vocal about our plans.   We soon realised that this was not the right way to go about it, because it didn't matter what else we said after the word "polyamoury" because all people could hear was "unlimited sex with as many people as you want".   

I haven't even considered the 'nuts and bolts' of an intentional community as far as the technical and economic details go.    Urine separation?   Community Rules?   Planning Permission?    

My only priority has been finding "like-minded souls".   People who are open, honest, entertaining, have a lot of personal character/integrity, people who love expressing themselves on some level - artistically, intellectually, spiritually, environmentally etc.   

The beauty of experimenting in SL is that we don't have to consider planning permissions and urine separation, rubbish disposal etc.   The financial considerations are slight - some contribution to the monthly tier (rent) payment would be good.

BUT I do have to say, my most immediate concern is my own feeling of "territory" that I have for our island.   When I first set it up I was building it more for just the two of us - Cal and I - and he gently reminded me that eventually we would be sharing it with others.    
I goofed big-time last week when I 'auto-returned' everything on the island which resulted in a completely empty island - every single thing we had put out was returned to our inventories, with the exception of one lone little mushroom which stood as a testament to how Cal and I first met.

This time round, while I have been re-building, I am more conscious of creating lots of areas for communal get togethers, private talks, romantic nooks and crannies, little surprises - very much with community in mind.   However, a neighbour called in the other day and offered me some of their plants.   This is a person who may well eventually be a part of our community, yet I declined their offer because on some deep primeval level, I didn't want anyone else's items on 'our' land.

Sense of ownership runs deep apparently.   Still, all these things are part of the learning process - of changing the desire for things to be ours.   There are just so many important issues to be considered in any sort of community that is put together - the financial aspect, morality (in a far wider context than who snuggles up with who at night), environment, compatibility (on so many different levels), direction etc.

One of my favourite sayings is, "The journey of a thousand miles begins with one step" and just as we do when we travel, the more stories we hear from others on traps to avoid, places to see, handy hints etc., it just makes the journey all the better.   For all of us.

Mia
Access_public Access: Public What do you think? Print views (1,938)  

Hanna

Posted on Feb 21st, 2008 by asecondlifediary : A Second Life Diary asecondlifediary

a short story from Cal's main blog at howtosavetheworld.ca
paris sidewalk cafe
"I want it all", Hanna told him.

He'd been walking back to his hotel after his conference presentation and decided to stop at one of Paris' renowned sidewalk bistros. He'd found one that looked attractive. As he walked along the row of seats and tables a striking woman in a trim burgundy suit followed him with her gaze. When he turned his head to look at her, she raised her head and looked directly into his eyes, not averting her stare for a moment. He stared back, with a slight smile at her forwardness. He'd discovered that Parisians are fond of checking each other out, especially in public places like the brasseries and the Métro, so he didn't think this terribly unusual. He stopped walking. There were few empty seats in the bistro, and as he walked back towards her, the woman, still gazing right into his eyes, nodded towards the seat beside her, inviting him to sit.

She offered him her hand and they introduced themselves. They spoke French. She said she was Austrian, from a village in the mountains. Her long wavy hair was jet black. They explained what had brought them to Paris, and then moved the discussion to philosophy, and life goals. Hanna spoke exuberantly about her intentions in life:

"I want it all. Love, friendship, adventure, discovery, fun. I can't, won't be tied down. It's not that I'm extravagant or unwilling to take responsibility. My ecological footprint is very small. I own next to nothing. I owe nothing. I don't drive. I care about the planet, and about people, especially people who are responsible, who care."

He asked her about her expensive-looking wardrobe, where she lived, and what she did for a living.

"I have three outfits, casual, that I made myself, that go with me everywhere. If I need something different, like this suit, I buy it in a thrift store and then, when I'm done with it, I donate it back, or give it to someone who needs it. My home, near a small village in Austria, is a one-room cottage in a forest. I sold the property to the government for one euro, on condition it never be developed and that I be able to use the cottage for free during my lifetime. It's powered by wind and solar power, and it's more or less empty. When I'm home I sleep there, prepare simple meals from local foods, write, paint, sculpt, weave, play music, and do research. But I'm a nomad, I'm comfortable anywhere and I like to move about and spend time with the many people I love, who are all over the planet. So I speak at conferences for the cost of transportation to the conference site. Most places I go I know people I can stay with, and I give them gifts of my artworks in thanks for their hospitality. If I don't know anyone, I just make a new friend when I arrive. It's fun."

She asked him where he was staying, and when he told her, she asked if she could spend the night, and the one following, with him. He suggested it might be awkward, since the room had only one bed. She smiled at him wryly.

"I was hoping we'd make good use of the bed. I love making love, with people who are intelligent, sensitive, and kind. Don't get me wrong, though. It's not because you're putting me up for the night. I'd offer to make love with you even if I couldn't stay the night. I want to do a sketch of you, and that's what I offer you for your accommodation. My offer of love is free." She smiled again.

They talked for awhile about how to make the world a better place. He told her he had given up on trying to bring about systematic change, and instead intended to create models of a better way to live: intentional communities, natural enterprises, self-organized collaborative events. She liked the approach. She was a model herself, he discovered, of living light upon the land, of the gift economy.

They ate vegan food, watched the people, laughed, poked gentle fun at each other. Then, at sunset, she took his hand and said simply "time to make love".

She was an expert lover. She teased him for hours, not letting him climax, while she taught him exactly how to please her, over and over. They took a bath together, and later a shower, in between rounds, and by the time they were sated it was the middle of the night. He was ready to sleep but she dragged him outside to show him Paris at night, when almost everyone was in bed. They walked for about an hour, holding hands, singing quietly, sharing confidences, laughing, crying. They went back to his hotel room and made love one more time, gently, slowly, by candlelight, and then slept in each other's arms until noon.

They made love again when they awoke, and then Hanna gave him a speech she had clearly recited often. She lay on his shoulder, caressing his chest, and said:

"Tomorrow I leave for Stuttgart, for a conference on collaboration and innovation. You are really on to something, you know, with your talk about Love and Conversation being the keys to making the world a better place. But I'm not so sure about intentional communities, or about physical communities at all. The world has changed, and you can't re-isolate people in communities, even if it may be for their own good. I have four lovers in Stuttgart and I am looking forward to being with them all. I will tell them about what I have learned from you, and from talking with you. I will probably pick up some new ideas and understanding from them, which I'll relay to you, the next time we meet. And we will meet again, in Rio, in January, when we're both at the same conference, and, if you're up for it, at my place in April, as we discussed. I just want you to understand that I love you, but I also love many others, and I have to be free to spend time with them too. You understand? We can have a lot more fun until I go tomorrow, but no sad goodbyes, no tears, right?"

He was quiet for a moment, and then nodded, smiling. She went on:

"You should try doing what I do. Sell everything you have and become a Love Nomad like me. Make your 'intentional community' the whole world, all the people who 'get' what you're saying or who, at least, because they're intelligent and sensitive and caring and imaginative, could get what you're saying. And just have fun loving them, in the way they want and deserve to be loved. And conversing with them, spreading the ideas and information and insights you have around, like a virus."

All that day they explored Paris, and each other. They returned to the bistro where they'd met for dinner, and Hanna, using the same 'eye trick' she'd used on him, invited a wildly-dressed Parisian woman named Mireille to join them for dinner. That night was a threesome, of passion, and of conversation about art. Mireille was a performance artist, and she had adorned her body with tattoos, piercings and temporary drawings about Gaia, making a virtual canvas of her body. Hanna drew a sketch of him on Mireille's shoulder as her two new lovers were sleeping in each other's arms, and when she rose in the morning she left them a note, with her cell phone number, that read:

"I give you to each other, in love."

(Image is from parlerparis.com. The character of Hanna is based on a polyamorous woman I knew many years ago, who at that time was living with five lovers. I'd like to believe this is what she might have grown up to become.)
Access_public Access: Public What do you think? Print views (324)